Showing posts with label National Reading Panel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Reading Panel. Show all posts

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Phonics is good, no matter what you say...

There was an article which cam out yesterday (3/9/07) in the New York Times (click the title for the link) highlighting the phonics-whole language debates.


I think that this is silly.


Children taught with a phonics approach are at an advantage when they are asked to perform tasks sch as fluency and comprehension. Additionally, phonics instruction also benefits comprehension as shown by the Comprehensive Leadership Program







As can be seen, there significant comprehension benefits to phonics instruction.

As I have made my point previously when discussing evidence based interventions for children with autism, not providing children with evidence based interventions amounts to educational neglect and some of the worst violations of social justice.

People in the article cited improvements using techniques that are not evidence based - however, their data are based on one district's one-year improvement - even after they changed their method of assessment (they changed their test).

Click here for the National Reading Panel's video entitled Teaching Children to Read. Although one may purchase it, it is available for free as a streaming download - just scroll down.

Thursday, January 05, 2006

National Reading Panel report

In 1997, Congress asked the “Director of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), in consultation with the Secretary of Education, to convene a national panel to assess the status of research-based knowledge, including the effectiveness of various approaches to teaching children to read.”

This panel was charged with providing a report that “should present the panel’s conclusions, an indication of the readiness for application in the classroom of the results of this research, and, if appropriate, a strategy for rapidly disseminating this information to facilitate effective reading instruction in the schools. If found warranted, the panel should also recommend a plan for additional research regarding early reading development and instruction.”


http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/intro.htm
Google